next up previous index
Next: PHYS341 Simulation of Up: Method Previous: Parameterisation of energy

Corrections for e-/e+ differences

The radiative energy loss for electrons or positrons is:

-{1ρ}( {dEdx})rad± = {NAvαre2A}(T+m) Z2Φrad±(Z,T)

Φrad±(Z,T) = {1αre2Z2(T+m)}∫0Tk{dσ±dk}dk

Reference [] says that:
``The differences between the radiative loss of positrons and electrons are considerable and cannot be disregarded.

[...] The ratio of the radiative energy loss for positrons to that for electrons obeys a simple scaling law, [...] is a function only of the quantity T/Z2 ''

In other words:

η = rad+(Z,T)Φrad-(Z,T)}= η({TZ2})

The authors have calculated this function in the range 10-7≤{TZ2}≤0.5 (here the kinetic energy T is expressed in MeV). Their data can be fairly accurately reproduced using a parametrisation:

where:

x = log( C {TZ2}) (T in GeV)

C = 7.5221 x106

a1 = 0.415

a3 = 0.0021

a5 = 0.00054

This e-/e+ energy loss difference is not a pure low-energy phenomenon (at least for high Z), as it can be seen from Tables gif, gif and gif.

 
1c{TZ2}(GeV) 1c|T1c|η 1c( {rad. losstotal loss})e-

10-9 ∼7 keV ∼0.1 ∼0

10-8 67 keV ∼0.2 ∼1

2 x10-7 1.35 MeV ∼0.5 ∼15

2 x10-6 13.5 MeV ∼0.8 ∼60

2 x10-5 135. MeV ∼0.95 > 90

 


Table: ratio of the e-/e+ radiative energy loss in lead (Z=82).

The scaling holds for the ratio of the total radiative energy losses, but it is significantly broken for the photon spectrum in the screened case. In case of a point Coulomb charge the scaling would hold also for the spectrum. The scaling can be expressed by:

+Φ-}= η( {TZ2}) &sp; {{dσ+dk}{dσ-dk}}= does not scale

If we consider the photon spectrum from bremsstrahlung reported in [] we see that:

{dσ±dk}= S±( {kT})&sp;{S+(k)S-(k)}≤1 &sp; S+(1) = 0 &sp;S-(1) > 0

 
1cT(MeV)3|c|C3cPb
&sp;ΔEl0 ΔEl Δσl ΔEl0 ΔEl Δσl

0.02 -2.86 -2.86 +52.00 -4.89 -4.69 +99.80
0.1 -0.33 -0.33 +21.10 -0.52 -0.47 +81.08
1 +0.07 +0.07 +6.49 +0.11 +0.11 +48.99
10 0.00 0.00 +1.75 0.00 +0.01 +23.89
102 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 +9.00
103 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 +2.51
104 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 +0.00
7c&sp;
7cΔEl=100 {El--El+El-} &sp;and&sp;Δσl=100 {σl-l+σl-}

 


Table: Difference in the energy loss and bremsstrahlung cross-section for e-/e+ in Carbon and Lead with a cut for γ and e± of 10keV. ΔEl0 is the value without the correction for the difference e-/e+ .

We further assume that:

{dσ+dk}= f(ε) {dσ-dk} &sp; ε= {kT}

In order to satisfy approximately the scaling law for the ratio of the total radiative energy loss, we require for f(ε) :

01f(ε)dε = η

From the photon spectra we require:

 

We have chosen a simple function f:

f(ε) = C (1-ε)α&sp;C,α> 0

 
1cT(MeV)3|c|C3cPb
&sp;ΔEl0 ΔEl Δσl ΔEl0 ΔEl Δσl

2 +4.19 +4.21 +7.29 +4.47 +6.88 +61.78
10 +0.87 +0.87 +1.93 +0.87 +1.14 +26.29
102 +0.08 +0.08 0.00 +0.06 +0.06 +9.10
103 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 +2.42
104 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 +0.00
7c&sp;
7cΔEl=100 {El--El+El-} &sp;and&sp;Δσl=100 {σl-l+σl-}

 


Table: Difference in the energy loss and bremsstrahlung cross-section for e-/e+ in Carbon and Lead with a cut for γ and e± of 1MeV. ΔEl0 is the value without the correction for the difference e-/e+ .

 
5c100 {Edep+-Edep-σ+2-2}()

1cDepth2cC2|cPb
1c|(X0 units)No e± diff e± diff No e± diff e± diff
0.5 -11.7 -13.0 -0.8 -3.9
1.0 -5.3 -4.9 -1.0 -4.1
1.5 +7.3 +8.0 -1.4 -3.5
2.0 +7.1 +5.3 -0.7 -0.0
2.5 +4.9 +4.3 +1.7 +3.6
3.0 +4.8 +4.1 +1.1 +4.3
3.5 +3.3 +2.7 +2.7 +3.1
4.0 +3.6 +5.3 +2.9 +3.0
4.5 +1.7 +2.8 +0.5 +2.3
5.0 +3.4 +3.5 -1.9 +1.8

 


Table: Difference in the shower development for e-/e+ in Carbon and Lead. No diff refers to the value without the correction for the difference e-/e+ .

from the conditions (gif), (gif) we get:

We have defined weight factors Fl and Fσ for the positron continuous energy loss and discrete bremsstrahlung cross section:

Fl= {1ε0}∫0ε0f(ε)dε &sp; Fσ= {11-ε0}∫ε01f(ε)dε

where ε0= {kcT} and kc is the photon cut BCUTE. In this scheme the positron energy loss and discrete bremsstrahlung can be calculated as:

( - {dEdx})+= Fl( - {dEdx})- &sp; σbrems+= Fσσbrems-

As in this approximation the photon spectra are identical, the same SUBROUTINE is used for generating e-/e+ bremsstrahlung. The following relations hold:

which is consistent with the spectra.

The effect of this e-/e+ bremsstrahlung difference can be also seen in e.m. shower development, when the primary energy is not too high. An example can be found in table gif.

PHYS341



next up previous index
Next: PHYS341 Simulation of Up: Method Previous: Parameterisation of energy


Janne Saarela
Mon Apr 3 12:46:29 METDST 1995